Battling hitchens and dsouzas arguments on religion

Wintery Knight 51 Comments I thought that I would go over an opening statement from a previous debate featuring Christopher Hitchens to find out what atheists are like in debates. I used his opening speech from his debate with Frank Turek.

Battling hitchens and dsouzas arguments on religion

While most Americans received updates and news reports about Black Friday, Hitchens and former Prime Minister Tony Blair participated in a Munk Debate on Religion. The debate focused on this statement—be it resolved religion is a force for good in the world. A crowd of more than 2, people turned out to watch these two distinguished men debate. Atheist Christopher Hitchens’ case against the existence of God. and no mention of the history of any particular religion. All arguments that assume specific theological or moral doctrines or specific religious history are irrelevant to a debate on generic 4 thoughts on “Atheist Christopher Hitchens’ case against the existence of. Oct 30,  · Hitchens repeats a strong anti-theist point: if you do a moral deed "for god" it is done for a reward or out of fear but not out of empathy or solidarity -it thus abolishes morality, individual.

But most of the crowd of more than 2, people who crowded into Powell Hall seemed to enjoy the spirited exchange, and gave the speakers a rousing ovation at the end of the program, which lasted a little under two hours.

Not coincidentally, both men have relatively new books in the stores, and the program was followed by a mass book signing.

Hitchens, a British-born essayist and gadfly best known for calling Mother Teresa "a fanatic and a fraud," takes the atheist position in "God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. He frequently cited Darwinian biology in support of his arguments, stating that neither human morality nor, at the other end of the spectrum, the genocidal acts of dictators -- atheistic dictators, he was careful to state -- would have evolved solely through the survival-of-the-fittest struggle posited by Darwin.

Atheist Christopher Hitchens’ case against the existence of God | WINTERY KNIGHT

And he expressed his belief that the Big Bang theory of the creation of the universe implied a creator, a "prime mover," a "supernatural cause. There has never been an argument that proves there was a prime mover. Repeatedly describing the Christian God as a "tyrant," Hitchens proclaimed that "emancipation from religion is the first step the human mind must take before it can move on to other questions," such as morality and the origins and meaning of the universe.

If you say you believe in God and you are wrong, what have you lost?

Pilate Program Flair Matrix

But if you reject belief in God and you are wrong, you will be lost. Pared of its sometimes impressive rhetoric, and of skillful and entertaining arguments on both sides, the whole debate could probably be reduced to the usual endpoint of most such debates: Both men admitted that they could neither prove nor disprove the existence of God, although each said that the preponderance of evidence was on their side.

Both said they had chosen to believe as they did. Much of the crowd consisted of student-age men and women. At the beginning of the debate, he made it clear that the subject would be "the Christian God," not the deities of other faiths.

Harper Barnes of St. Louis is the author of "Never Been a Time:Christopher Hitchens only writes books and debates with religious beings on the matter of justice, but was he out doing anything?

Militant Atheism is the same as .

How good are the atheistic arguments of Christopher Hitchens? | WINTERY KNIGHT

Now if there is a true religion it must be both Thick and Clear: for the true God must have made both the child and the man, both the savage and the citizen, both the head and the belly.

And the only two religions that fulfil this condition are Hinduism and Christianity.

Big Issues Tap here to turn on desktop notifications to get the news sent straight to you. People do not die for us immediately, but remain bathed in a sort of aura of life which bears no relation to true immortality but through which they continue to occupy our thoughts in the same way as when they were alive.
NY Daily News - We are currently unavailable in your region Pro I would love to debate someone on this issue.
Christopher Hitchens’s Very Personal Handbook on Cancer Etiquette A reply to the moderator's comment should suffice.
Remembering Christopher Hitchens: Religious Belief and Hitch's Greatest Hits | HuffPost BBC Christopher Hitchens walked on stage with the evidence of his cancer plain for the world to see. His dark suit jacket hung off a much-reduced frame and his head — now devoid of hair due to chemotherapy — shone under the arc lights.

Humanists and atheists are saddened by the death of the prolific writer and outspoken atheist, Christopher Hitchens. “Humanity has lost a powerful stalwart for atheism,” said Roy Speckhardt, executive director of the American Humanist Association.

“Christopher Hitchens changed the discussion about religion and non-belief by championing public .

Recent Opinions

Poison or Cure? Religious Belief in the Modern World A debate between Christopher Hitchens (Atheist) and Alister McGrath (Christian) Hosted by the Ethics and Public Policy Center and the Berkley Center for Religion, Peace, and World Affairs at Georgetown University 11th October Reviewed by Glenn Peoples.

Hitchens may have some good arguments, but he is not very passionate. Debate on atheism are very serious and philosophically deep. Debate is more like a popular show and doesn’t solve real issues.

Battling hitchens and dsouzas arguments on religion

I didn’t see any new argument in those debates. So these debates are always disappointing. God Is Not Great is a book by Anglo-American author and journalist Christopher Hitchens, in which he makes a case against organized Christopher Hitchens.

Tony Blair v Christopher Hitchens: fight the good fight | World news | The Guardian